Needle Document Loader

import os

os.environ["NEEDLE_API_KEY"] = ""

os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = ""

from langchain_community.document_loaders.needle import NeedleLoader

collection_id = "clt_01J87M9T6B71DHZTHNXYZQRG5H"

# 컬렉션에 문서를 저장하기 위해 NeedleLoader 초기화
document_loader = NeedleLoader(
    needle_api_key=os.getenv("NEEDLE_API_KEY"),
    collection_id=collection_id,
)

files = {
    "tech-radar-30.pdf": "https://www.thoughtworks.com/content/dam/thoughtworks/documents/radar/2024/04/tr_technology_radar_vol_30_en.pdf"
}

document_loader.add_files(files=files)

# 컬렉션의 문서 표시
# collections_documents = document_loader.load()

# 컬렉션의 문서 표시
# collections_documents = document_loader.lazy_load()

import os

from langchain.chains import create_retrieval_chain
from langchain.chains.combine_documents import create_stuff_documents_chain
from langchain_community.retrievers.needle import NeedleRetriever
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI

llm = ChatOpenAI(temperature=0)

# Needle 리트리버 초기화 (Needle API 키가 환경 변수로 설정되어 있는지 확인)
retriever = NeedleRetriever(
    needle_api_key=os.getenv("NEEDLE_API_KEY"),
    collection_id="clt_01J87M9T6B71DHZTHNXYZQRG5H",
)

# 어시스턴트를 위한 시스템 프롬프트 정의
system_prompt = """
    You are an assistant for question-answering tasks.
    Use the following pieces of retrieved context to answer the question.
    If you don't know, say so concisely.\n\n{context}
    """

prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages(
    [("system", system_prompt), ("human", "{input}")]
)

# 문서 체인(stuff chain)과 리트리버를 사용하여 질문-응답 체인 정의
question_answer_chain = create_stuff_documents_chain(llm, prompt)

# 리트리버와 질문-응답 체인을 결합하여 RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) 체인 생성
rag_chain = create_retrieval_chain(retriever, question_answer_chain)

# 입력 쿼리 정의
query = {"input": "Did RAG move to accepted?"}

response = rag_chain.invoke(query)

response

{'input': 'Did RAG move to accepted?',
 'context': [Document(metadata={}, page_content='New Moved in/out No change\n\n© Thoughtworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12\n\nTechniques\n\n1. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nAdopt\n\nRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the preferred pattern for our teams to improve the quality of \nresponses generated by a large language model (LLM). We’ve successfully used it in several projects, \nincluding the popular Jugalbandi AI Platform. With RAG, information about relevant and trustworthy \ndocuments — in formats like HTML and PDF — are stored in databases that supports a vector data \ntype or efficient document search, such as pgvector, Qdrant or Elasticsearch Relevance Engine. For \na given prompt, the database is queried to retrieve relevant documents, which are then combined \nwith the prompt to provide richer context to the LLM. This results in higher quality output and greatly \nreduced hallucinations. The context window — which determines the maximum size of the LLM input \n— is limited, which means that selecting the most relevant documents is crucial. We improve the \nrelevancy of the content that is added to the prompt by reranking. Similarly, the documents are usually \ntoo large to calculate an embedding, which means they must be split into smaller chunks. This is often \na difficult problem, and one approach is to have the chunks overlap to a certain extent.'),
  Document(metadata={}, page_content='New Moved in/out No change\n\n© Thoughtworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12\n\nTechniques\n\n1. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nAdopt\n\nRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the preferred pattern for our teams to improve the quality of \nresponses generated by a large language model (LLM). We’ve successfully used it in several projects, \nincluding the popular Jugalbandi AI Platform. With RAG, information about relevant and trustworthy \ndocuments — in formats like HTML and PDF — are stored in databases that supports a vector data \ntype or efficient document search, such as pgvector, Qdrant or Elasticsearch Relevance Engine. For \na given prompt, the database is queried to retrieve relevant documents, which are then combined \nwith the prompt to provide richer context to the LLM. This results in higher quality output and greatly \nreduced hallucinations. The context window — which determines the maximum size of the LLM input \n— is limited, which means that selecting the most relevant documents is crucial. We improve the \nrelevancy of the content that is added to the prompt by reranking. Similarly, the documents are usually \ntoo large to calculate an embedding, which means they must be split into smaller chunks. This is often \na difficult problem, and one approach is to have the chunks overlap to a certain extent.'),
  Document(metadata={}, page_content='New Moved in/out No change\n\n© Thoughtworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12\n\nTechniques\n\n1. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nAdopt\n\nRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the preferred pattern for our teams to improve the quality of \nresponses generated by a large language model (LLM). We’ve successfully used it in several projects, \nincluding the popular Jugalbandi AI Platform. With RAG, information about relevant and trustworthy \ndocuments — in formats like HTML and PDF — are stored in databases that supports a vector data \ntype or efficient document search, such as pgvector, Qdrant or Elasticsearch Relevance Engine. For \na given prompt, the database is queried to retrieve relevant documents, which are then combined \nwith the prompt to provide richer context to the LLM. This results in higher quality output and greatly \nreduced hallucinations. The context window — which determines the maximum size of the LLM input \n— is limited, which means that selecting the most relevant documents is crucial. We improve the \nrelevancy of the content that is added to the prompt by reranking. Similarly, the documents are usually \ntoo large to calculate an embedding, which means they must be split into smaller chunks. This is often \na difficult problem, and one approach is to have the chunks overlap to a certain extent.'),
  Document(metadata={}, page_content='New Moved in/out No change\n\n© Thoughtworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12\n\nTechniques\n\n1. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nAdopt\n\nRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the preferred pattern for our teams to improve the quality of \nresponses generated by a large language model (LLM). We’ve successfully used it in several projects, \nincluding the popular Jugalbandi AI Platform. With RAG, information about relevant and trustworthy \ndocuments — in formats like HTML and PDF — are stored in databases that supports a vector data \ntype or efficient document search, such as pgvector, Qdrant or Elasticsearch Relevance Engine. For \na given prompt, the database is queried to retrieve relevant documents, which are then combined \nwith the prompt to provide richer context to the LLM. This results in higher quality output and greatly \nreduced hallucinations. The context window — which determines the maximum size of the LLM input \n— is limited, which means that selecting the most relevant documents is crucial. We improve the \nrelevancy of the content that is added to the prompt by reranking. Similarly, the documents are usually \ntoo large to calculate an embedding, which means they must be split into smaller chunks. This is often \na difficult problem, and one approach is to have the chunks overlap to a certain extent.'),
  Document(metadata={}, page_content='New Moved in/out No change\n\n© Thoughtworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12\n\nTechniques\n\n1. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nAdopt\n\nRetrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the preferred pattern for our teams to improve the quality of \nresponses generated by a large language model (LLM). We’ve successfully used it in several projects, \nincluding the popular Jugalbandi AI Platform. With RAG, information about relevant and trustworthy \ndocuments — in formats like HTML and PDF — are stored in databases that supports a vector data \ntype or efficient document search, such as pgvector, Qdrant or Elasticsearch Relevance Engine. For \na given prompt, the database is queried to retrieve relevant documents, which are then combined \nwith the prompt to provide richer context to the LLM. This results in higher quality output and greatly \nreduced hallucinations. The context window — which determines the maximum size of the LLM input \n— is limited, which means that selecting the most relevant documents is crucial. We improve the \nrelevancy of the content that is added to the prompt by reranking. Similarly, the documents are usually \ntoo large to calculate an embedding, which means they must be split into smaller chunks. This is often \na difficult problem, and one approach is to have the chunks overlap to a certain extent.')],
 'answer': 'Yes, RAG has been adopted as the preferred pattern for improving the quality of responses generated by a large language model.'}